Topical delivery of PD-1 inhibitors with laser-assisted passive diffusion and active intradermal injection: Investigation of cutaneous pharmacokinetics and biodistribution patterns.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current cancer immunotherapeutic treatment with PD-1 inhibitors is administered systemically. However, a local treatment strategy may be advantageous as it could provide targeted drug delivery as well as attenuate side effects seen with systemic treatments. For keratinocyte cancers, where surgical excision is not always applicable, an alternate local treatment approach would be beneficial. This study aims to examine cutaneous pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab, locally delivered either by ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted passive diffusion or active intradermal injection, in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vivo pig skin was either exposed to CO2 AFL (80 mJ/mb by two stacked pulses of 40 mJ/mb) at 5% or 15% density followed by topical application of nivolumab (1 mg/ml, 100 µl/10 × 10 mm) or intradermally injected with nivolumab (1 mg/ml, 100 µl). Cutaneous nivolumab delivery was evaluated at different timepoints (0, 1, 2, 4 hours and 2 days) at two tissue depths (100-800 and 900-1600 µm) by ELISA. Visualization of cutaneous biodistribution was shown in vertical tissue sections using HiLyte FluorTM 488 SE labeled nivolumab for fluorescence microscopy whereas nivolumab was DOTA-tagged with Dysprosium before the laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry analysis (LA-ICP-MS). RESULTS: Our in vivo study revealed different pharmacokinetic and biodistribution patterns for the AFL- and injection techniques. A superficial horizontal band-like uptake of nivolumab was provided with AFL-assisted passive diffusion whereas a deep focal deposition was seen with active intradermal injection, compared with controls showing remnant deposition on the skin surface. AFL-assisted nivolumab uptake in upper dermis peaked after 4 hours (p < 0.01). The cutaneous concentration of nivolumab achieved by intradermal injection was markedly higher than with AFL, the highest deposition with intradermal injection was detected at time 0 hours in both upper and deep dermis (p < 0.01) and decreased throughout the study period, although the concentration remained higher compared with saline control injections at all time points (0 hours -2 d) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Local cutaneous delivery of nivolumab with either AFL or intradermal injection revealed two different pharmacokinetic and biodistribution patterns. Passive AFL-assisted diffusion of nivolumab resulted in enhanced uptake after 4 hours, while intradermal actively injected nivolumab showed immediate enhanced cutaneous deposition with retention up to 2 days after injection. The two local delivery techniques show potential for development of individualized treatment strategies depending on the clinical tumor appearance.

Topical Delivery of Nivolumab, a Therapeutic Antibody, by Fractional Laser and Pneumatic Injection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: PD-L1 is a tumor ligand that binds to the PD-1 receptor on immune cells, thereby inhibiting the antitumor immune response. The antibody nivolumab is a PD-1 inhibitor, Food and Drug Administration approved for systemic treatment of several aggressive cancer types. Topically applied nivolumab may hold potential as a future strategy to treat keratinocyte cancer, but its molecular properties preclude unassisted topical uptake. The aim of this study was to investigate uptake and biodistribution of topically delivered nivolumab, assisted by two physical enhancement techniques with different delivery kinetics; ablative fractional laser (AFL) and electronically controlled pneumatic injection (EPI). STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro porcine skin was exposed to CO2 AFL (20 mJ/mb, 5% density), followed by passive diffusion of nivolumab in a Franz cell (1 mg/ml, 18 hours, n = 6) or treated with EPI (4 bar) for immediate delivery of nivolumab (1 mg/ml, 10 minutes, n = 6). The resulting nivolumab skin concentrations were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at three skin depths (100, 500, and 1500 µm), comparing the uptake from assisted delivery with intact skin. Biodistribution of nivolumab in the skin for all interventions was visualized by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS: Delivery of nivolumab by AFL-assisted passive diffusion and immediate EPI both resulted in significantly enhanced uptake of nivolumab in all skin depths compared with intact skin (P < 0.05). With AFL, nivolumab concentrations reached 86.3 µg/cm3 (100 µm), 105.8 µg/cm3 (500 µm), and 19.3 µg/cm3 (1500 µm), corresponding to 2-10% of the applied concentration, with the highest deposition in the mid dermis. Immediate EPI delivered 429.4 µg/cm3 (100 µm), 584.9 µg/cm3 (500 µm), and 295.9 µg/cm3 (1500 µm) into the skin, corresponding to 29-58% of the applied nivolumab concentration. From qualitative visualization of the biodistribution, it appeared that nivolumab distributed in a horizontal and continuous homogenous band in the upper and mid dermis through AFL-exposed skin, whereas EPI-delivery showed a deep focal deposition extending into the deep dermis. CONCLUSIONS: AFL-assisted passive diffusion and immediate EPI-assisted delivery show the potential to deliver therapeutic antibodies locally. Future in vivo and pharmacokinetic studies would reveal the full potential for topical antibody delivery by energy-based devices. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.